The submission for 'litespace' suffers from significant red flags, primarily the hyperbolically false claim that 'most people have used my product' for a two-person startup with no verifiable revenue. The submission contains contradictory information, defining the project as both a 'hybrid workspace' tool and an 'AI recruiting platform.' With zero verifiable traction, vague technical details, and an unrealistic audience definition ('everyone'), the project lacks the necessary evidence to demonstrate meaningful utility or viability at this stage.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline