The submission for Linkful.io lacks credibility and verifiable data. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a project with no visible market footprint, search presence, or traffic data. Listing 'leadership' as a technology and providing vague descriptions ('Linkful.iois in the MarketingTech Industry') indicates a low-effort or placeholder submission. With no evidence of revenue, active users, or technical innovation in a saturated market (link management), the project scores exceptionally low on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline