The submission represents the global professional network LinkedIn, an entity with immense utility, reach, and traction. However, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by inaccurate data (claiming a team size of 51-200 vs actual ~20k, describing a HackerNoon tag page rather than the platform) and vague assertions ('everyone', 'most people'). While the inherent value of the LinkedIn platform sets a high floor for the score, the 'Imposter/Low-Effort' nature of the data provided significantly penalizes the Technical Innovation and Response Quality metrics, preventing it from reaching the 700+ score typical for an entity of this scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline