The submission conflates two distinct entities: 'Lili for Life' (a French startup producing dyslexia lamps, matching the URL) and 'Lili' (a US neobank with ~125 employees). The project evaluated is the dyslexia lamp. While the technology (pulsed light based on University of Rennes research) is innovative and verifiable (CES 2025 presence), the submission contains false traction claims ('most people have used my product') and inaccurate audience data ('everyone'). The project is a legitimate niche hardware startup, but the submission quality is critically low.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline