The submission contains significant red flags indicating a high likelihood of being vaporware or a low-effort fabrication. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a startup launching in 2025 with a team of 6. The revenue field references 'marketcap', suggesting a crypto-token focus rather than a functional biotech business, yet no verifiable token or commercial product was found. The description relies heavily on industry buzzwords (AI, stem cells, longevity) without technical evidence. The email address format appears auto-generated. Consequently, the project receives a near-zero score due to lack of credibility and verifiable traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline