The submission conflates two distinct entities: 'Lido.app' (the submitted URL/description, a low-code spreadsheet builder) and 'Lido Finance' (the submitted business type/tech, a multi-billion dollar DeFi protocol). The project was evaluated as 'Lido.app' based on the URL. While the actual product is a verifiable Series A startup (backed by investors like a16z/Pareto, raised ~$8M+), the submission contains severe inaccuracies regarding team size (922 vs ~20), audience ('everyone'), and business type. The score reflects the solid underlying product utility and verified funding, heavily penalized for the low-quality, hallucinated submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline