The project proposes a web-based 3D visualization platform, which has inherent utility for architects and artists. However, the submission is critically undermined by hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and a complete lack of verifiable data. A search for 'LiBiWorks' yields no significant digital footprint, contradicting the traction claims. The lack of technical detail, revenue metrics, or team information results in a score reflecting a concept stage with low credibility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline