The project appears to be a standard IT brokerage or consultancy service, but the submission lacks credibility due to hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and a lack of digital footprint (the website is not indexed by search engines). While the business model is valid, the discrepancy between the claimed launch date (2010) and the absence of verifiable traction or online presence results in a score reflecting minimal proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline