The submission points to a legitimate, established software development company (Leobit) with 50-200 employees and a verified market presence since 2014. However, the submission itself is of critically low quality, containing hyperbolic and false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience is 'everyone') and lacking specific evidence. While the entity is real and likely successful, the PoU score is heavily penalized due to the red flags in the response quality and the lack of verifiable data provided in the input.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline