The submission for Legau presents a valid problem statement (legal workflow optimization) but lacks any verifiable evidence of utility or traction. The input data contains disqualifying claims, such as the audience being 'everyone' and traction being 'most people have used my product,' which are factually impossible for a niche B2B tool. With no technical details, revenue data, or team information provided, the project appears to be either a placeholder or a low-effort submission with no proof of real-world application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline