The project references Lattice, a verifiable 'unicorn' status HR software company with significant real-world utility and traction (valued at ~$3B). However, the specific submission data is of exceptionally poor quality, containing factually incorrect financial figures ('marketcap 17000000'), hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), and vague descriptions. The final score is heavily penalized by the low 'Quality Factor' (0.5) due to the submission's lack of effort and accuracy, preventing it from reaching the 600-700+ range typical for a company of this actual scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline