The project 'Latch' corresponds to LatchBio, a legitimate Series A bioinformatics platform with ~$33M in funding and high real-world utility. However, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality, containing hyperbolic, false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone') and lacking specific details. The score reflects the strong underlying entity value (Series A, revenue, partnerships) heavily penalized by the 'Vague or unsupported claims' Quality Factor (0.5x) and a low Response Quality score due to the lazy and inaccurate submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline