The submission describes a generic IT consultancy but lacks credible details. The claim that 'most people have used my product' contradicts the reported team size (6) and financial metrics, severely damaging credibility. The response quality is low, using vague terminology and pseudonymity ('ShadowWalker'), resulting in a minimal score reflecting a lack of verifiable traction or serious intent.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline