The project represents a legitimate, long-standing Chartered Accountant firm (est. 1936) with significant operational scale (350+ team) and verifiable government audit clients. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing factually incorrect claims (e.g., 'marketcap: 50000', 'most people have used my product') and lacking evidence of the specific technological innovations (AI, Blockchain) mentioned. While the underlying business is robust and useful, the submission fails to demonstrate a specific, scalable technology project, resulting in a low PoU score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline