The project 'Kula' (legal tech) appears to be a YC W22 company that achieved significant early traction ($200k ARR in 3 months) before pivoting to 'Kular' (AI Sales/Recruitment). The submission describes the original legal product but categorizes it as recruitment, creating a conflict. While the historical traction and YC backing are strong validation signals, the submission quality is poor, containing delusional claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and obsolete descriptions. The score reflects the legitimate YC pedigree discounted by the confusing current state and low-quality data entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline