The submission describes a legitimate and high-value Family Office (Kresk Développement) and its philanthropic arm, but fails to present a specific technology project or product. The entry contains significant red flags, including hyperbolic claims ('audience reach: everyone', 'most people have used my product') and a lack of technical detail. While the underlying business entities (SVR, Lazartigue) are successful, the submission itself is low-quality, lacks specific metrics, and does not align with the criteria for a technology proof of usefulness evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline