The submission references 'Klara', a legitimate healthcare communication platform founded in 2013 (likely klara.com), but uses a questionable domain (klarahr.com) and provides extremely low-quality, hyperbolic data. Claims such as 'audience reach: everyone' and 'most people have used my product' are false. The score is heavily penalized (Quality Factor 0.5) due to the lack of verifiable evidence in the submission and the unprofessional response quality, despite the potential high utility of the actual company.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline