The project represents a legitimate student society and accelerator at King's College London, confirmed via external search. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing hyperbolic and verifiably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). While the underlying entity has educational value and local traction within the university ecosystem, the provided data is unusable for a higher score. The 'marketcap' figure appears to be a confusion of terms or a misrepresentation of grant funding.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline