The submission for Kiki Momo Cigars presents a standard luxury goods concept but lacks verifiable evidence of traction or scale. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and significantly undermines credibility, resulting in a low Quality Factor. The revenue metric ('all time marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous, suggesting either early-stage total sales or a conflation with crypto terminology. With 'Internet' listed as the sole technology and an unrealistic 'everyone' audience target, the project scores low on innovation and reach definition. The evaluation reflects a small-scale e-commerce operation with poor submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline