The project 'Kievit Scientific' appears to be a standard management consultancy for the life sciences sector rather than a technology project. The submission contains several 'red flags' including unrealistic claims (Reach: 'everyone', Traction: 'most people have used my product') and mismatched data (Project Name vs. Name field). As a service-based business with no evident technical innovation and poor submission quality, it scores very low on the Proof of Usefulness scale designed for technology ventures.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline