The submission presents a severe identity conflict: the URL points to the City of Kielce, the title refers to a Technology Park, and the description outlines an Oncology Center. Claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are factually incorrect and hyperbolic. While the underlying entities (ŚCO Hospital, Kielce Technology Park) are legitimate and useful organizations, the submission data is incoherent, likely spam or low-effort, and fails to demonstrate specific project merit under the Proof of Usefulness framework.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline