The submission appears to be a low-effort or test entry characterized by significant inconsistencies. While the description references a legitimate organization (KHP Ventures/King's Health Partners), the claimed traction ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect and damages credibility. The discordance between the user name 'SwiftFang' and the medical project scope, combined with a likely student email address and lack of specific metrics, results in a score reflecting minimal verifiable utility or traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline