The submission represents an established IT services agency (founded 2007) with a team of 25-50. While the business is likely legitimate and operational, the submission quality is critically low, characterized by hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). The lack of specific traction metrics, financial data, or distinct technological innovation results in a low score, despite the company's longevity. The project is evaluated as a standard service provider with a poor evidence presentation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline