The submission represents a personal portfolio and freelance consultancy ('Kester Sheridan') rather than a distinct technology product or platform. While the individual demonstrates strong technical expertise in Creative Technology (VR, IoT, Advertising), the submission suffers from hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., audience reach is 'everyone', 'most people have used my product'). The financial metric provided ('marketcap: 500000') is mislabeled and lacks currency or context. As a Proof of Usefulness evaluation for a scalable project, this scores low due to category mismatch, lack of verifiable product traction, and poor data quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline