The project appears to be a small digital product studio or freelancer portfolio based in Portland (Kaznaka/Peter Hironaka). While the business itself is legitimate, the submission contains significant exaggerations and vague data (e.g., claiming the audience is 'everyone', citing 'Internet' as the only technology, and stating 'most people have used my product'). The revenue metric uses the term 'marketcap' incorrectly for a service business. Due to the lack of verifiable evidence and low-quality submission data, the Proof of Usefulness score is heavily penalized.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline