The submission describes a standard IT services agency but suffers from significant data inconsistencies and exaggerated claims. While the core service (software development) has utility, the stated traction ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect for a B2B agency. The discrepancy between team size (125 claimed vs. 30 in text) and revenue ('50000 all time marketcap') suggests either severe data entry errors or a lack of business viability. The project lacks the verifiable metrics or innovation required for a higher score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline