The submission describes a traditional law firm ('Karaçam & Şir') rather than a technology project, with no software or technical innovation presented. The input data contains significant credibility issues, including the claim that 'most people' have used the service and the misuse of financial terminology ('marketcap' for revenue). As a non-technical entry with unverifiable and unrealistic traction claims, it scores minimally on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline