The submission presents a significant disconnect between the provided URL (a legitimate Austrian B2B consulting and IoT firm, Kapitel D) and the submission details (Project Name 'ThunderStone', 'marketcap' revenue, and exaggerated traction claims). While the underlying business found at the URL has verifiable utility and B2B traction, the submission itself contains red flags, false claims ('most people have used my product'), and incoherent data, resulting in a low score typical of spam or erroneous entries.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline