The project submission presents significant red flags, including contradictory descriptions (Digital PR vs. Steel), unverifiable and hyperbolic claims of traction ('most people have used my product'), and a lack of digital footprint for a project claiming a 2007 launch. The URL appears to be inactive or not indexed, and the audience reach is defined too broadly to be meaningful. The submission lacks credible evidence of utility or existence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline