The submission suffers from significant credibility issues, notably the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used my product' despite no verifiable web presence. The financial metric 'all time marketcap' is misused, and the description outlines a generic IT staffing agency without specific technical innovation. With no evidence of the claimed 30-person team or revenue, the project scores in the lowest tier reflecting a lack of proof of work.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline