The submission for 'Jupeak' (also referenced as 'ThunderShade') presents significant red flags indicating a low-credibility or spam project. Key discrepancies include the name mismatch, the unrealistic claim that 'most people have used my product', and the listing of a 'marketcap' for a software company. The team size of 125 is unsupported by the low financial figures and lack of digital footprint. The project lacks verifiable utility, traction, or reach, resulting in a near-zero score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline