The submission represents 'Junar, Inc.', a legitimate Open Data platform established in 2010, but the entry itself is of extremely low quality and likely automated or spam. While the company exists and has verified government clients (Real-World Utility), the submission makes factually incorrect claims (e.g., traction: 'most people have used my product', audience: 'everyone') and contains broken data fields ('marketcap: null'). The discrepancy between the actual company's history and the nonsensical submission details results in a heavily penalized score, reflecting a failure to provide valid proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline