The submission represents a small software consultancy (JS Tigers) established in 2016. While likely a legitimate small business serving clients, the PoU submission is extremely low quality, containing hyperbolic claims (audience reach: 'everyone', traction: 'most people have used my product') without supporting evidence. There are no metrics for revenue or user base, and the project description is a generic service listing. Consequently, the score reflects a lack of verifiable impact or differentiation compared to established benchmarks.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline