The submission describes a legitimate executive search firm, 'Jordan Sheppard Ltd.', but the quality of the entry is extremely poor and likely spam or bot-generated. Key fields contain demonstrably false or nonsensical claims (e.g., audience reach is 'everyone', traction is 'most people have used my product'). While the underlying business exists and has a professional history, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence, precise metrics, or coherent answers, resulting in a very low Proof of Usefulness score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline