The submission represents Edward Jones, a massive financial services firm with verifiable large-scale traction ($10B+ revenue, millions of clients). However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring likely fictitious or irrelevant data (e.g., submitter 'WhisperHeart', technologies 'construction', email format). Consequently, while the 'Audience Reach' and 'Traction' scores are high due to the entity's real-world status, the 'Technical Innovation' and 'Response Quality' are negligible. A strict Quality Factor penalty (0.5x) was applied across all metrics to account for the lack of verifiable project ownership and the 'low-effort' nature of the data provided.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline