The submission represents a standard executive coaching service ('Jon Cobb Coaching') but is plagued by severe inaccuracies and red flags. The project name 'SwiftStorm' appears unrelated, and the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false. While the service exists and has verifiable 'micro-influencer' traction on LinkedIn and podcasts, it lacks the technological innovation, scale, and audience reach required for a high PoU score. The submission data (revenue, team size) contradicts external evidence of a solo or small-team practice.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline