The submission describes a professional coaching and consultancy service rather than a technology product. While the detailed biography suggests a legitimate service business with professional utility, the submission suffers from critical quality issues, including hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product', 'everyone') and a lack of technical innovation ('Internet' is the only tech listed). The disparity between the project name and the internal 'name' field ('LunarShade') further indicates a low-effort submission. As a service business without scalable technology or verifiable digital traction metrics, it scores low on this framework.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline