The submission appears to be a low-quality or test entry for a small software agency ('House code' likely mistranslated from 'Software House'). The claim that 'most people have used my product' is unverifiable and highly contradictory to the stated team size of 2-10 and lack of recognized branding. The technology section lists soft skills (leadership) rather than technical stacks, and contact information is malformed.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline