The submission describes a local web design agency in East Yorkshire. While the service itself has basic utility, the application is severely undermined by hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., audience is 'everyone', traction is 'most people have used my product'). The technical description is non-existent ('Internet'), and the metrics provided lack credibility. The project scores very low due to a lack of evidence, poor response quality, and highly exaggerated reach claims compared to the likely reality of a small service business.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline