The submission represents a small IT consultancy (6 employees) but relies on hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims, such as an audience reach of 'everyone' and traction stating 'most people have used my product'. The financial metric provided ('all time marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous and likely conflates revenue with valuation. The project offers generic IT services with no evidence of unique technical innovation or market differentiation. Due to the lack of verifiable traction and poor response quality, the score is minimal.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline