The submission represents a high-authority domain (Government of Japan) but suffers from critical quality issues, including hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), irrelevant data (1885 launch date), and lack of specific technical details. The submission appears to be low-effort or spam, failing to demonstrate the project's utility within the evaluation framework despite the inherent value of the entity.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline