The project 'iwi.earth' presents a standard gig-economy concept with a 0% commission model but fails to provide credible evidence of viability or traction. The submission contains hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and confusing metrics ('marketcap: 50000' listed as revenue). Search results indicate the entity exists as a small UK-registered startup but is virtually invisible online, heavily overshadowed by unrelated brands. The claimed team size of 125 contradicts the low valuation and lack of digital footprint, suggesting 'users' may be misclassified as 'team'. The lack of technical detail and the unrealistic self-assessment result in a very low PoU score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline