The submission appears to be invalid or low-quality. The project name 'Itecons' refers to a construction and energy institute, while the description text refers to 'CEDIPRE', a law research center, indicating a severe mismatch. The metrics provided (revenue of 1,000,000,001 and claim that 'most people have used my product') are nonsensical and factually incorrect for a niche academic department. The submission lacks credible evidence of traction, innovation, or utility in a technology context.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline