The submission for Itechnets presents significant red flags regarding data integrity and verifiable traction. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a niche IT training provider. The revenue metric is stated as 'marketcap' without currency, likely referring to a small valuation (possibly in PKR given the region implied by search context) rather than revenue. While IT education has utility, the lack of evidence, exaggerated claims, and poor submission quality result in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline