The submission references a legitimate academic research project (GreenCity4Aging) funded by the FCT, addressing relevant social issues (aging and urban green spaces). However, the submission quality is extremely low, featuring verifiable falsehoods in the traction and revenue fields (claiming '300M marketcap' and 'most people have used my product'). As a technology product assessment, it scores very low due to lack of a defined technological solution, incoherent data, and exaggerated reach claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline