The submission contains significant discrepancies and hallmarks of low-quality data. While 'isio.com' is a legitimate UK-based pension advisory firm, the description text (French) appears to be copied from a different Canadian entity (isio.ca), and the evidence of traction ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect and hyperbolic. The team size (7,500) and audience claims ('everyone') are exaggerated or inaccurate. The submission fails to provide verifiable proof of usefulness for the specific project described.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline