The project (IPinfo.io) is a top-tier, widely adopted infrastructure service with massive verified reach (500k+ users, billions of requests). However, the submission itself ('SilentShade') was of extremely low quality, providing incorrect naming, 'null' revenue, and vague traction claims ('most people'). The score reflects the high verifiable utility and market dominance of the actual service, heavily penalized in the 'Response Quality' and 'Traction' evidence sections due to the lack of effort in the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline