The project submission suffers significantly from hyperbolic and unverifiable claims, most notably the assertion that 'most people have used my product,' which contradicts the reported team size of 6 and 'marketcap' of 500,000. The audience definition ('everyone') lacks targeting, and the technical description provides no evidence of innovation beyond standard IT services. The use of 'marketcap' for what appears to be a consultancy business is confusing. Overall, the submission lacks the credibility and evidence required for a higher PoU score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline