The project represents a software development agency (Inzint) with a claimed team size of 55, indicating potential economic activity. However, the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence of usefulness, relying on hyperbolic and factually dubious claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'marketcap: null'). While the underlying business model (B2B services) has utility, the lack of specific client case studies, metrics, or validated reach results in a low score. The response quality is poor, missing key financial and impact data required for a higher rating.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline