The submission for 'Internet Sciences Inc.' presents significant discrepancies between its claims and verifiable data. While the entity exists as an emerging public company (formerly Luxury Trine Digital Media Group), the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a company with no mass-market footprint. The stated financials ('marketcap: 50000') contradict the claimed team size of 125, which likely refers to a loose network of consultants rather than full-time staff. The project description relies heavily on buzzwords (IoT, AI, Digital Transformation) without detailing a specific, functional product. Consequently, the project scores near zero due to a lack of verifiable traction and low-quality evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline